The CGA Online workspace structures a professional comprehensive geriatric assessment. Its public page lists 16 sections, more than 100 fields and an estimated 35–50 minutes. The workflow covers a person’s context and goals, functional and physical measures, red flags, a problem list and a team plan. Answers remain in the open tab’s memory, are not sent to the operator and are not stored in localStorage; closing or refreshing the page removes entered information. The confirmed status is a professional protocol, version 1.0. The methodology states that the tool has not yet undergone independent validation and is intended to support documentation and clinical discussion until prospective evaluation. Its practical value is to bring observations into one working structure, reveal incomplete areas and prepare multidisciplinary discussion with named responsibilities and reassessment. The service does not diagnose, prescribe or discontinue medication, or replace examination or the clinical team’s decision. Completeness, agreement between professionals, usability and effects on outcomes that matter to patients require separate studies; this version alone does not establish clinical benefit.
Project review
CGA Online: a professional workflow with a private session
The CGA Online workspace structures a professional comprehensive geriatric assessment. Its public page lists 16 sections, more than 100 fields and an estimated 35–50 minutes. The workflow covers a person’s context and goals, functional and physical measures, red flags, a problem list and a team plan. Answers remain in the open tab’s memory, are not sent to the operator and are not stored in localStorage; closing or refreshing the page removes entered information. The confirmed status is a professional protocol, version 1.0. The methodology states that the tool has not yet undergone independent validation and is intended to support documentation and clinical discussion until prospective evaluation. Its practical value is to bring observations into one working structure, reveal incomplete areas and prepare multidisciplinary discussion with named responsibilities and reassessment. The service does not diagnose, prescribe or discontinue medication, or replace examination or the clinical team’s decision. Completeness, agreement between professionals, usability and effects on outcomes that matter to patients require separate studies; this version alone does not establish clinical benefit.