Autowave openly describes how it checks publications about biological waves. The route has seven blocks: defining the term, measurement, study design, causality, reproduction, the boundary of transfer and source checks through databases and identifiers. The public methodology is version 1.1; the page states that its literature base and criteria were updated on 20 August 2026. The confirmed stage is a working research portal with a separate methodology, curated library and labels for “established”, “under study” and “hypothesis”. Its practical value is to give researchers and science editors a short verification route before an interesting observation becomes a strong conclusion. A spectral peak does not prove message transmission, an in-vitro effect does not prove an effect in people, and a published paper does not prove independent reproduction. The portal does not perform experimental validation itself or confirm clinical efficacy. Review completeness, the applicability of the criteria to individual fields and the usability of the route still require expert assessment and further development.
Project review
Autowave: seven checks that separate an observation from a conclusion
Autowave openly describes how it checks publications about biological waves. The route has seven blocks: defining the term, measurement, study design, causality, reproduction, the boundary of transfer and source checks through databases and identifiers. The public methodology is version 1.1; the page states that its literature base and criteria were updated on 20 August 2026. The confirmed stage is a working research portal with a separate methodology, curated library and labels for “established”, “under study” and “hypothesis”. Its practical value is to give researchers and science editors a short verification route before an interesting observation becomes a strong conclusion. A spectral peak does not prove message transmission, an in-vitro effect does not prove an effect in people, and a published paper does not prove independent reproduction. The portal does not perform experimental validation itself or confirm clinical efficacy. Review completeness, the applicability of the criteria to individual fields and the usability of the route still require expert assessment and further development.